WebDesk National
26 April
Sandeep Dhand Ludhiana
The Supreme Court has solicited a response from the Election Commission regarding a public interest petition seeking legislation for canceling elections and conducting fresh ones if voters express more preference for candidates over ‘NOTA’ (None of the Above) during elections. Since a 2013 Supreme Court ruling, ‘NOTA’ has been an option available to voters on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs).
The petition, filed by a writer, activist, and motivational speaker, calls for legislative measures to address scenarios where voters opt for candidates instead of ‘NOTA.’ The Court’s directive to the Election Commission seeks clarity on how such situations would be handled under existing electoral laws.
As the debate continues over the significance of ‘NOTA’ and its implications for electoral outcomes, the Supreme Court’s intervention underscores the need for comprehensive legislation to govern voting preferences. The Election Commission’s response will shed light on potential legal frameworks to address the petitioner’s concerns and ensure the integrity of the electoral process.